Framework for Reviewing Media
Premise for framework
Premise 1 : Art work is fundamentally subjective.
Premise 2 : The artist always operate from a worldview which needs to understood through compassion, and by post-poning judgement as much as possible.
To Understand the art from all sides, have the art speak to you.
The Opinion formed should thereby make the argument both for and against the meida being consumed.
3 factor criteria for making any review being stripped subjective perspectivity and personal as much as possible ;
The truth should be spoken and that too by following a consious thread of thought about the media to its uncomfortable conclusions. Multiple Interpretations of the truth is permitted as long a thought is followed to its conclusions.
One pragmatic way to suppose this is to follow through having foundational axiomatic principles and addressing the causal responsibility of the four fold root of principle of sufficient reason.
The review should not be harmful nor be personal at its core. Any such harm implied by the art should be called out or condemned , but the personal agent behind the art should be reasoned through with compassion. This implied ethical axiom also suggest that the opinion should be formed through your volition, this presupposes that reviewer haven’t formed any unconsious opinion form other reviewers.
Project less, delay critique - Any argument made should be made in a joyful jest and it being not through resentful manner nor through guilt shaming the agent . The opinion made should be made falsifiable by counter-evidence by either presenting an anti-thesis of the artist’s implication or by presentng your subjective perspective arising from your lived experience. Which then needs to follow through with sufficent care and reason.